Localization of Humanitarian Action: Four Country Case Studies

Cover of Localization Report Case Study

Localization is a loosely defined agenda meant to correct for historic and systematic exclusion and marginalization of actors from crisis-affected countries, often referred to as “local actors,” in the structures of international humanitarian response. This is not a new agenda but was formalized through the Grand Bargain agreements that came out of the 2016 World Humanitarian Summit, which emphasized increasing funding to local humanitarian actors, more  equitable partnerships between local and international actors, more integrated coordination efforts, and increased capacity building for local actors.

In 2021, the Bureau of Humanitarian Assistance of USAID commissioned the Feinstein International Center to draft a landscape paper to explore localization of humanitarian assistance. Because many issues related to the localization of humanitarian assistance are inherently context specific, the study team decided to include four case studies to shape the broader report.

The following studies provide “deeper dives” into four contexts to illustrate how the concepts discussed in the broader landscape paper differ across contexts. Each case study describes the country’s humanitarian context, discusses how key concepts (such as local) are defined in the country, describes the state of localization, reviews factors that contribute to and hinder localization, and makes recommendations.

These case studies were made possible through support provided by the Office of Acquisition and Assistance, Bureau for Management, United States Agency for International Development (USAID), under the terms of Cooperative Agreement No. 720FDA20CA00065. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID.





Cover of Localization Report Case Study


Thumbnail of Report "Do Famine Declarations Really Lead to Increased Funding?

This policy brief examines the relationship between famine declarations and funding since 2011. It shows that, with that one exception, there is little evidence that famine declarations actually result in a rapid increase in funding.

Image of Brief Cover: Actingin in Advance of Flooding

In 2022 UN OCHA led a pilot anticipatory action intervention in South Sudan. This brief presents UN actors’ perceptions of this intervention.

Cover of Report "Sex, age (and more) still matter"

This report reviews progress, outlines barriers to further progress, and makes recommendations to advance gender equality in the humanitarian system.

Picture of report cover "Co-investigators but with different power"

Building on a previous report on the localization of humanitarian assistance, this study focuses on issues unique to the localization of humanitarian research.

Thumbnail of Famine Prevention Report Cover

This study reviews what we have learned regarding policies and interventions to prevent famine, and how these can be scaled up more rapidly.

Cover of Report "Anticipatory Action in Motion"

This anticipatory action landscape brief summarizes what has been published on anticipatory action since 2020 and what progress has been made on existing recommendations.

Load more