The Humanitarian Evidence Program
Humanitarian actors and researchers have amassed evidence about the state of knowledge in the humanitarian sector, including assessments of what works and what does not work. Synthesizing this information and making it readily available to policymakers and humanitarian practitioners remains challenging. The Humanitarian Evidence Program produces a series of reviews to distill humanitarian evidence and communicate it to key stakeholders in order to enable better decision-making and improve humanitarian policy and practice.
In the tabs to the left, you can find the published systematic reviews of the evidence, each of which is accompanied by a protocol detailing the methodology and an evidence brief synthesizing key insights. You can also find the program’s guidance documents for how to map, synthesize, and critically appraise humanitarian evidence.
This initiative is a DFID-funded partnership between Oxfam and the Feinstein International Center (FIC) at the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University.
The Humanitarian Evidence Program aims to strengthen the evidence base of humanitarian policy and practice and to enhance the availability of this evidence-based research to decision-makers. This includes, but is not limited to, the following key activities:
- Consulting key stakeholders in the humanitarian sector to identify the key areas and questions for evidence synthesis.
- Producing guidance for how to conduct an evidence synthesis in the humanitarian field, as well as how to appraise humanitarian evidence.
- Publishing protocols for reviews.
- Engaging with researchers from low- and middle-income countries to ensure diverse representation in the humanitarian conversation.
- Making requests for proposals from humanitarian researchers and practitioners to conduct the reviews.
- Assessing proposals and selecting researchers to carry out reviews.
- Providing feedback on the draft evidence syntheses to ensure that the documents provide a rigorous synthesis and analysis of the evidence base for each research area.
- Emphasizing the significance of evidence for conversations on humanitarian policy and action. The Humanitarian Evidence Program submission on this topic was quoted in the World Humanitarian Summit synthesis report.
- Focusing on research uptake throughout the program. Final reviews will leverage existing platforms and networks in innovative ways to communicate results, spark conversation about the role of evidence-based humanitarian research, and influence policy and practice.
Evidence Brief: The Impact of In-Kind Food Assistance on Pastoralist Livelihoods in Humanitarian Crises
This is an evidence brief, accompanying the full systematic review on the impact of in-kind food assistance on pastoralist livelihoods in humanitarian emergencies.
Evidence Brief: The Influence of Market Support Interventions on Household Food Security
This is an evidence brief, accompanying the full systematic review on the impact of market support interventions on household food security.
Evidence Brief: The Impact of Mental Health and Psychosocial Support Interventions on People Affected by Humanitarian Emergencies
This is an evidence brief, accompanying the full systematic review on mental health and psychosocial support interventions in humanitarian emergencies.
Evidence Brief: The Impact of Protection Interventions on Unaccompanied and Separated Children in Humanitarian Crises
This is an evidence brief, accompanying the full systematic review on the impact of protection interventions on unaccompanied and separated children in humanitarian settings.
Evidence Brief: Managing Acute Malnutrition in Children in Humanitarian Emergencies
This is an evidence brief, accompanying the full systematic review on acute malnutrition in humanitarian emergencies.
Evidence Brief: Shelter Self-Recovery in Humanitarian Emergencies
This is an evidence brief, accompanying the full systematic review on shelter in humanitarian settings.
Evidence Brief: WASH Interventions in Disease Outbreak Response
This evidence brief accompanies the full systematic review on WASH interventions in disease outbreak response.
Evidence Brief: What Practices Are Used to Identify and Prioritize Vulnerable Populations Affected by Urban Humanitarian Emergencies?
This is an evidence brief, accompanying the full systematic review on urban identification practices in humanitarian emergencies.
The Impact of In-Kind Food Assistance on Pastoralist Livelihoods in Humanitarian Crises
This evidence synthesis represents the first ever attempt to identify, synthesize and evaluate existing evidence on both the short- and long-term impacts of in-kind food assistance on pastoralist populations and their livelihoods in humanitarian crises.
The Influence of Market Support Interventions on Household Food Security
This evidence synthesis represents the first ever attempt to identify, synthesize and evaluate the existing evidence on the influence of market support interventions on household food security in humanitarian crises.
The Impact of Mental Health and Psychosocial Support Interventions on People Affected by Humanitarian Emergencies
This systematic review investigates both the process of implementing mental health and psychosocial support programmes and their receipt by affected populations, as well as assessing their intended and unintended effects.
The Impact of Protection Interventions on Unaccompanied and Separated Children in Humanitarian Crises
Programming for unaccompanied and separated children cases is often prioritized in the context of humanitarian interventions. But what is the impact of protection interventions on UASC in humanitarian crises in low and middle income countries?
Recovery, Relapse, and Episodes of Default in the Management of Acute Malnutrition in Children in Humanitarian Emergencies
This systematic review represents the first attempt to apply systematic review methodology to establish the relationships between recovery and relapse and between default rates and repeated episodes of default or relapse in the management of acute malnutrition in children in humanitarian emergencies in low- and middle-income countries.
The Effectiveness and Efficiency of Interventions Supporting Shelter Self-Recovery Following Humanitarian Crises
What effects do humanitarian interventions that support affected populations’ own shelter self-recovery processes have on household-level outcomes following a crisis? And what factors have helped or hindered the implementation of such interventions? This evidence synthesis represents the first ever attempt to systematically review the existing evidence for an answer.
WASH Interventions in Disease Outbreak Response
How does the use of WASH interventions reduce disease outbreaks? This evidence synthesis identifies, synthesizes and evaluates the available evidence in order to find a response.
What Practices Are Used to Identify and Prioritize Vulnerable Populations Affected by Urban Humanitarian Emergencies?
This systematic review represents the first ever attempt to systematically search, sort and synthesize the existing evidence in order to consolidate findings on the tools, methods and metrics used to identify and prioritize vulnerable people, households and communities, including those displaced within and to urban areas.
The Impact of Food Assistance on Pastoralist Livelihoods in Humanitarian Crises: An evidence synthesis protocol
This protocol outlines plans for conducting an evidence synthesis on the impact of food aid on pastoralist livelihoods.
The influence of market support interventions on household food security: An evidence synthesis protocol
This protocol outlines the proposed research questions and methodology for an evidence synthesis on the influence of market support interventions on household food security in humanitarian crises.
The impact of mental health and psychosocial support programs for populations affected by humanitarian emergencies: A systematic review protocol
This protocol details the methodology for an evidence synthesis on psychosocial and mental health support in humanitarian crises. The evidence synthesis asks “What are the effects of mental health and...
The impact of protection interventions on unaccompanied and separated children in humanitarian crises: An evidence synthesis protocol
This protocol details the methodology for an evidence synthesis on child protection in humanitarian crises. The evidence synthesis asks: “What is the impact of protection interventions on unaccompanied and separated...
Relationships between recovery and relapse, and default and repeated episodes of default in the management of acute malnutrition in children in humanitarian emergencies: A systematic review protocol
This protocol details the methodology for an evidence synthesis on acute malnutrition in humanitarian crises. The evidence synthesis asks: “What is the evidence on the relationship between recovery and/or cure...
The effectiveness and efficiency of interventions supporting shelter self-recovery following humanitarian crises: An evidence synthesis protocol
This protocol details the methodology for an evidence synthesis on shelter in humanitarian crises. The evidence synthesis asks: “What is the evidence on the effectiveness and efficiency of interventions that...
Impact of WASH Interventions during Disease Outbreaks in Humanitarian Emergencies: A systematic review protocol
This protocol details the methodology for an evidence synthesis on WASH interventions during humanitarian crises. The evidence synthesis asks “What are the outcomes and impacts of WASH interventions during disease...
What are the practices to identify and prioritize vulnerable populations affected by urban humanitarian emergencies? A systematic review protocol
This protocol details the methodology for an evidence synthesis on urban humanitarian action. The evidence synthesis asks, “What are the practices to identify and prioritize populations affected by urban humanitarian...
Evidence Synthesis in the Humanitarian Sector: A Guidance Note
This Guidance Note discusses an approach to systematic evidence synthesis in the humanitarian field. Though its recommendations explicitly apply to the evidence synthesis outputs commissioned by the Humanitarian Evidence Programme,...
Synthesizing practices of evidence appraisal in the humanitarian field
This paper synthesizes evidence appraisal practices to inform evidence syntheses in the Humanitarian Evidence Program. It is addressed to all audiences interested in humanitarian evidence, including but not limited to researchers,...
Briefing Paper: Synthesizing evidence appraisal practices in the humanitarian field
This briefing paper accompanies a full report on synthesizing evidence appraisal practices to inform evidence syntheses in the Humanitarian Evidence Program. It is addressed to all audiences interested in humanitarian evidence,...
Mapping Evidence Syntheses in the Humanitarian Sector: Insights and Challenges
This publication accompanies a catalog of existing evidence syntheses in the humanitarian sector and discusses the methodological approach to this exercise. The purpose of this study was three-fold: (a) to identify gaps...
Humanitarian Evidence Synthesis: A Mapping Exercise
How has the humanitarian sector synthesized and cataloged evidence based research between 2009 and the present? The map linked below is a starting point for identifying existing evidence synthesis outputs in this field. This map has informed assessments on which topics are currently in need of evidence synthesis. It is accompanied by a memo explaining the approach to cataloging these evidence syntheses; the two documents should be read concurrently.
Catalogue of Evidence Appraisal Practices
The catalog linked below accompanies a full report that synthesizes evidence appraisal practices to inform evidence syntheses in the Humanitarian Evidence Programme. It is addressed to all audiences interested in humanitarian evidence, including but not limited to researchers, humanitarian practitioners, and policymakers. The full report helps answer the question, ‘How confident are we in the quality of evidence supporting a finding?’ The catalog contains an overview of the reviewed evidence appraisal approaches. Additionally, a briefing paper with key insights can be found here.
This program is a DFID-funded partnership between Oxfam and the Feinstein International Center (FIC) at the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University. Oxfam and FIC are highly-recognized and respected names in the humanitarian sector and bring a range of complementary skills, experience, and capacity to support the objectives of the program. In addition to the Oxfam-FIC team, the Program Management Board has consulted researchers, practitioners, and policymakers who engage in the humanitarian sector in a wide range of roles and who bring diverse perspectives to the conversation.
The state of humanitarian evidence
This is the fourth and final video as part of the Humanitarian Evidence Program webinar series. The video explores the state of humanitarian evidence through talks given by several panelists.
Shelter Self-Recovery and Urban Response
This is the third video as part of the Humanitarian Evidence Program webinar series. The video explores what we can learn about identifying and prioritizing vulnerable people from shelter self-recovery...
The impact of WASH responses and market support interventions on disease outbreaks and food security
The is the second video as part of the Humanitarian Evidence Program webinar series. The video explores WASH responses to disease outbreaks as well as the impact of market interventions...
What works in mental health and child protection
The first video as part of the Humanitarian Evidence Program webinar series. The video explores the topics of mental health and child protection through talks given by several panelists.
Humanitarian Evidence Program Syntheses Launch
In February and March 2017 the Humanitarian Evidence Program released eight syntheses of evidence. Roxanne Krystalli discusses the project, its purpose, and what people can find in the syntheses.