Constraints and Complexities of Information and Analysis: Data Planning in Famine-Risk Countries

data planning in famine

The humanitarian community has technical definitions of famine and food security or nutrition emergencies: the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC). The classification requires good quality and coverage of food security, nutrition and mortality data. However, humanitarian emergencies and potential famines often occur in conflict contexts where the available data does not reach the high standards required for an IPC analysis. This means that data planning in famine risk countries may be unable to reach firm evidence-based conclusions.

Key Findings:

  • Collecting high-quality data is a triumph against the odds of security, access, and logistics constraints. Analyzing this information demands multisectoral, multi-partner efforts that include all the main stakeholders and puts the government in the lead. The fact that teams are regularly able to collect data is a testament to their ingenuity, determination, and dedication to ensuring that evidence-based approaches are used to direct humanitarian response to the areas of highest need.
  • The limited technical capacity and high turnover of staff impede local, international, and governmental partners’ engagement in all stages of the IPC process. Partners are often reported to have a limited understanding of the process and are often not incentivized to participate.
  • Time pressure and limited coordination between actors are impeding a more streamlined and collaborative data analysis process.
  • The systems to identify hotspots are weak. Even when a hotspot is identified in an ad hoc manner, most systems are not sufficiently flexible to respond with a prioritized and in-depth assessment to ensure early response.
  • Insecurity and access are key constraints to data collection.
  • Geographical gaps in data are reported to be largely due to insecurity, issues with political authorization, and a lack of funding.
  • Gender-sensitive analysis of the IPC data is not available. Gender disaggregated data sets are available for nutrition, however, the IPC process does not consider the significance of this data.

These findings are based on interviews conducted with IPC or Cadre Harmonisé (CH) food security analysis teams in four famine-affected or threatened countries: South Sudan, Somalia, Nigeria, and Yemen.

ASSOCIATED PROJECT

SUBJECTS

PUBLICATION TYPE

LOCATION

RELATED PUBLICATIONS

Thumbnail image of report cover

This study examines how anticipatory action was perceived and experienced among Ethiopians living with drought alongside other crises.

Thumbnail of Report "Do Famine Declarations Really Lead to Increased Funding?

This policy brief examines the relationship between famine declarations and funding since 2011. It shows that, with that one exception, there is little evidence that famine declarations actually result in a rapid increase in funding.

Image of Brief Cover: Actingin in Advance of Flooding

In 2022 UN OCHA led a pilot anticipatory action intervention in South Sudan. This brief presents UN actors’ perceptions of this intervention.

Report cover thumbnail

This report provides insights and perspectives from participatory workshops with displaced female youth in the Kurdistan region of the Republic of Iraq (KRI).

Cover of Report "Sex, age (and more) still matter"

This report reviews progress, outlines barriers to further progress, and makes recommendations to advance gender equality in the humanitarian system.

Picture of report cover "Co-investigators but with different power"

Building on a previous report on the localization of humanitarian assistance, this study focuses on issues unique to the localization of humanitarian research.

Load more