International organizations increasingly rely on local partners to engage in humanitarian action. This is particularly the case in highly insecure situations or when host governments limit or deny international access. Despite these trends, there have been few attempts to examine the effectiveness of international-local partnerships either in general or in insecure “remote management” contexts. This study explores these partnerships in the setting of cross-border assistance from Turkey to Syria in 2014.

This research was funded by the Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration at the US State Department.

Challenges for Remote Management in Insecure Settings: Sustainability of Local Organizations and Donor Withdrawal: Second Briefing Paper from Breaking the Hourglass
Breaking the Hourglass#2 (2)_Page_1

This is the second briefing paper emerging from a longer report on humanitarian action and partnerships in remote management settings. This briefing paper offers key insights and findings on the...

Read More
Challenges within Remote Management in Insecure Settings: Trade-offs, Capacities, and Trust: First Briefing Paper from the Breaking the Hourglass Report
Breaking-the-Hourglass-Briefing-Paper_Page_1

This is the first briefing paper emerging from a longer report on humanitarian action and partnerships in remote management settings. This paper offers key insights and findings on the challenges...

Read More
Breaking the Hourglass: Partnerships in Remote Management Settings–The Cases of Syria and Iraqi Kurdistan
Breaking-the-Hourglass_Syria_Iraqi-Kurdistan-1

International organizations increasingly rely on local partners to engage in humanitarian action. This is particularly the case in highly insecure situations or when host governments limit or deny international access....

Read More